Lord Sewel has resigned from the House of Lords after being filmed allegedly taking drugs with prostitutes. In a personal film for the Daily Politics soapbox series, Richard . Answer: Yes. It's sketchy, but I think I can recall a few newspapers talking about the house of lords being scheduled to be abolished and replaced with a British Senate. For the last 30 years, the Federal Republican Party has dominated the American electoral system. "The House of Lords is useless and dangerous to the people of England." This was the statement made in an historic move whereby the House of Lords was abolished on the 19th March 1649 by an Act of Parliament. House of Lords on the front page this weekend 22nd March 2021. More details Sign this petition 2,729 signatures Show on a map 10,000 Just like the monarchy and private schools, it is symptomatic of a society which pays lip service to democracy and meritocracy but so often falls short of achieving it in reality. This would ensure that there is no unelected body in Parliament which can influence the laws passed by the elected representatives of the people. Answer: Yes. In 1917 the Bryce Commission was set up to consider House of Lords reform proposals. . Membership is by appointment, heredity or official function.Like the House of Commons, it meets in the Palace of Westminster in London . The House of Lords is a medieval relic from a time when land ownership was a major source of political power, and just as ownership of land moved from generation to generation so did the titles. Max Shanly. Yet to abolish the Lords and either replace it with another elected chamber, or not replace it at all ( . Steps taken so far include: . TikTok video from Natalie Bennett (@nataliebennettgreen): "We should abolish the whole power to deprive people of citizenship. Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances. Cassiopeia. . The former MEP caused controversy when she refused to apologise for historical support of the IRA bombing in Warrington that killed two children. Report Post. It set out proposals for a House of Lords made up of 300 members (80 per cent elected . An SNP MP has repeated his call for the House of Lords to be scrapped, saying it is "the . A debate exists as to whether the HofL should be abolished, given the fact they are unelected, yet have a say in legislation. Baroness Evans of Bowes Park speaking during the House of Lords tributes to Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, on April 12, 2021. Observations from The Minister for the Constitution and Devolution (Chloe Smith): The Government have no plans to abolish the House of Lords, which has a key role in scrutinising the Executive and as a revising Chamber; it is important that the way it is constituted reflects that role and the primacy of the House of Commons as the elected Chamber. The House of Lords should be abolished and "replaced with an elected senate", according to former Liberal leader David Steel. The Conservative 2019 manifesto committed to . It gave hereditary peers the right to disclaim their titles, and for women peers to sit in the Upper House of the British Parliament for the first time. Deemed to be a threat, the House of Lords would not meet until twelve years later in 1660 after the restoration of the monarchy. The first time arrived on 19 March 1649, during a hiatus in the English Revolution. A clear majority of Britons (58%) supports the notion of allowing the people to directly elect their lords. It has over 800 peers - 484 of whom attended the Lords each day in the 2016/17 parliamentary session. I never thought I'd say that, but when the facts change, I change my mind. The Parliament Act 1911 removed the ability of the House of Lords to veto money bills; with any other bills, the House of Commons was given powers to overrule the Lords' veto after three parliamentary sessions. "Should the UK House of Lords be abolished?" Yes Although it was once a useful institution, containing the Hereditary Peers, a relatively incorruptible bunch, and a smattering of subject matter experts, its now a retirement home for civil servants and party loyalists. The House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with a citizens' chamber of 400 ordinary people, says a journalist and author. Their blocking of the Internal Market Bill recently exemplified this, where 800 peers thwarted the democratic will of the people. Support. The unelected House of Lords has continually faced controversy for their unaccountability and excessive power. The Labour Party should be . Originally Answered: Why cant the house of lords be abolished? The House of Lords is a relic from a bygone era. The House of Lords is undemocratic. . 646 views | original sound - Natalie Bennett 10.6K thegreatawakening74 philemon olale For the last 30 years, the Federal Republican Party has dominated the American electoral system. Mencken, an old-line Liberal, has described the approach of the Federal Republicans as "a history of compromises with the new forces, of gradual yielding, for strategic purposes, to ideas that are intrinsically at odds with its . They do not exist to thwart the will of the elected Government. How to go about abolishing the House of Lords is a decision to come . Filip Nawrocki , lives in The United Kingdom original sound. 2AbstractThis discourse holds that the House of the Lords should be abolished for four reasons. The House of Lords could be dissolved, but it probably shouldn't because it is one half of Britain's parliament. (Roger Harris / House of Lords 2021 via Wikimedia Commons) The House of Lords should be reformed. Ministers are to unveil revolutionary plans to replace the House of Lords with a slimmed down elected 'senate' containing just 300 members. Parliament's upper chamber has become larger and more expensive. Watch on TV: Freeview 236, Sky 515, Virgin 626Listen on DAB+ RadioDownload the GB News App to watch live wherever you are, catch up with all our shows and ge. Labour wants to abolish the House of Lords and replace it with a US-style elected senate if it wins the general election. The House of Lords works well. We take care of the easy part of the question: what place is there in the 21st century for a legislative body composed of some members from . Nov 11, 2021. It was one of the first acts of the only dictator we ever had: Oliver Cromwell. Good points but if elected on a proportional basis rather than first past the post and elected in different election cycles for different term lengths it could actually have added value beyond what the house of commons politics brings. The House of Lords should be abolished, leaving the House of Commons as the sole legislative body of Parliament. 07 Jun 2022 The Queen is widely respected, and almost certainly would be elected head of state if a vote were held. Lucy Pegg No No democratic parliament should include hereditary peers or lifetime appointees. Second, the appointment is largely controlled by one person who can likely influence theworkability and integrity of the house of the Lords. This would ensure that there is no unelected body in Parliament which can influence the laws passed by the elected representatives of the people. Baroness Claire Fox has told GB News she thinks the House of Lords should be "abolished". The House of Lords has come under renewed scrutiny this week, following the resignation of Lord Sewel over drug and prostitution allegations and reports that a secret reform panel has been set up.. To do this would be to abolish the House of Lords altogether and start afresh in a way that was useful and constructive. 'It's perfectly reasonable for people to call me a hypocrite.' Baroness Claire Fox believes the House of Lords should be abolished because she thinks it's undemocratic. But as Tony . The UK has a bicameral chamber in their Parliament, which means that there are two houses of Parliament. Share . Because A second chamber is necessary. Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party's public statement on this issue. The cost of the House of Lords has ballooned. The House of Lords is a chamber of experts. Baroness Fox of Buckley was included on a 36-strong peerage list in 2020 that led to accusations of cronyism . For Britain, the German danger has become remote and Lord Nathan, Labor's Under Secretary of State for War, told the House of Lords lately, "We must be careful to safeguard against a breakdown . Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party's public statement on this issue. Journalist H.L. A peerage should be earned, not inherited. I think they are actually going to do it. The example of Mancroft and his ridiculous statements on Fox hunting just goes to illustrate how out of touch and self-serving "old money" really is. For most of Labour's history, our policy has been to abolish the House of Lords or have an elected second chamber. The revelations of cash for peerages has resulted in a few members of opposition parties calling for the House of Lords to be abolished. The House of Lords should be abolished The House of Lords is irrelevant in modern life and detrimental to our democracy. House of Lords should be scrapped, says SNP. That should be a source of shame and it undermines the UK when it talks about abuses of governments in other parts of the world. It was one of the first acts of the only dictator we ever had: Oliver Cromwell. Readers' poll: should the House of Lords be abolished? Should the House of Lords be abolished? If the prime minister really wants to give someone a peerage, his or her patronage powers seem to be basically unfettered: in late 2020, the House of Lords appointments commission objected to the . Here's a fact: the House of Lords is the second biggest legislative chamber in the world after the Chinese National People's Congress, which represents a country of 1.4 billion people. Why The House Of Lords Shouldn't Be Abolished But Reformed The House of Lords could be something great if governments weren't too afraid or selfish to change it for the better. Abolishing the Lords would be an act of constitutional vandalism, of elective dictatorship. Our new issue is coming soon - subscribe for just 10! For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. Payments to peers have increased by 29% to 23m, and their number is . As it says, is it now time to get rid of the House of Lords. BORIS JOHNSON'S Brexit deal has now cleared the House of Lords after briefly stalling in Parliament's upper chamber, paving the way for it to become law ahead of the January 31 EU exit date. House of Lords to be abolished and replaced by . the UK only needs one chamber of Parliament." Discuss. The former MEP caused controversy when she refused to apologise for historical support of the IRA bombing in Warrington that killed two children. @IainDale | @Fox_Claire | #CrossQuestion . The House of Lords as it exists today is not a timeless relic of antiquity, but a Frankenstein's monster of shreds and body parts, assembled piecemeal over a century of constitutional tinkering. There is a serious case to instill some democratic process to the Lords. The House of Lords should remain untouched. Whilst I agree the Upper House should be elected and we shouldn't pay deference to titled people, now is not the time. Mencken, an old-line Liberal, has described the approach of the Federal Republicans as "a history of compromises with the new forces, of gradual yielding, for strategic purposes, to ideas that are intrinsically at odds with its . When justifying the House of Lords in the English Constitution (1867), Walter Bagehot thought it . For the House of Lords does not deserve the obloquy being heaped upon it from both Right and Left obloquy that is laced with hypocrisy. I joined talkRADIO's Darryl Morris on Wednesday to discuss whether it is time to abolish the House of Lords, the appointed upper chamber of the UK House of Commons. A similar proportion of Leavers and Remainers (76% respectively) said that the Lords should be either abolished or elected (in part/in full). As if that weren't bad enough, 26 bishops appointed by the Church of England are members of the House of Lords, making the UK the only country apart from Iran to have clerics in government as a right. That seemed like a pretty definite thing. Again. Parliament is dissolved every five years for elections and the House of Lords remains since they are appointed. The Government of the day make the decisions, we elect them to do that. 2,721 Signatures. The other house is just a retirement home for redundant Politicians, and Prime Ministers favourites. Yet the 'Red' corridor's surrounding our second chamber, the House of Lords were not on the tour. Parliament was torn between . 28 July 2015. House of Lords should be ABOLISHED, not moved north, expert says BORIS JOHNSON may be looking to move the House of Lords to York to entrench the Tory gains in Labour's Red Wall. The House of Lords must be reformed and ultimately abolished. However, the doubts over the severity of that action and the effect it would have on the British political system mean that any reform may be a bit of while away. The House of Lords Act in 1999 severely diminished the roles and member of the Lords and only allowed some 92 hereditary peers to remain in the House. No democratic society should accept the principle that its parliament includes hereditary peers or lifetime appointees - it's time to abolish the House of Lords. The Stage 1 reform is committed to continuing the transformation and ultimately getting rid of the remaining 92 hereditary peers. Thus far, parliament seems to be working for them and there shouldn't be any drastic changes. PUBLIC LAW - House of Lords "The House of Lords should be abolished. If the people are to be sovereign, the House of Lords needs to be abolished. The House of Lords, formally The Right Honourable the Lords Spiritual and Temporal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in Parliament assembled, also known as the House of Peers, is the upper house of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. For instance, they are the House of Commons and House of Lords. The Peerage Act of 1963, passed fifty years ago this week, was the first democratic challenge to the power and traditions of the House of Lords in modern times. It is easy to chastise the House of Lords as a cesspit for all that is wrong with our democracy, yet a look underneath the country's constitutional bonnet shows that reform rather than riddance is what the House of Lords really needs. Should the house of lords be reformed or abolished?Do we need a 2nd chamber? On the whole, there are compelling arguments for the House of Lords to be abolished, most of them revolving around the undemocratic nature of the second chamber. Leavers were more likely to say the Lords should be abolished (36%) than Remainers (21%), while Remainers were more likely to say the Lords should be entirely elected (38%) than Leavers (24%). That's the question students are asked to consider in this From the Source activity for Edexcel A-Level Politics. The report argues the House of Lords should be abolished and replaced with a new Senate, or Upper House, representing different parts of the UK. The Commons can't do all the work and a 'second pair of eyes' is needed to take a look at the Really Marvellous Idea that the current bunch of idiots have come up with and say 'Just hang on a minute, sunshine' Baroness Claire Fox has told GB News she thinks the House of Lords should be "abolished".